Assortative coordinating among same-sex as well as other-sex couples in the usa, 1990-2000
38. Maenpaa, Elizabeth. & Jalovaara, M. (2013). The consequences of homogamy inside socio-financial records and you will training on change away from cohabitation to marriage. Acta Sociologica , 56 (3), 247-263.
39. Oprisan, E., & Cristea, D. (2012). A number of details off dictate about concept of marital satisfaction. Procedia – Social and you can Behavioural Sciences , , 33 , 468-472.
Good longitudinal analysis out of be concerned spillover in-marriage: Do spousal help adequacy boundary the consequences?
forty. Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent survive – Character similarities from inside the people. Identification and you may Individual Distinctions , 45 (6), 533-535.
I be prepared to find distinctions certainly read nations, while they provides diffe rent sociocultural standing, in addition to distinctions based in the personal issues that get effect on this new balance in relationship
43. Ruppanner, L., Bernhardt, Elizabeth., & Branden, Meters. (2017). Division regarding housework and his and her look at cleaning fairness: A good typology regarding Swedish lovers. Demographic Search , 36 , 501-524.
forty-two. Russell, Roentgen. J. H., & Wells, P. (1993). Marriage therefore the Relashionship Survey: MARQ Handbook . Sevenoaks: Hodder and you may Stoughton.
45. Russell, R. J. H. & Wells, P. (1991). Identification similarity and you may top-notch matrimony. Character and you can Personal Variations , several (5), 407-412.
47. Russell, Roentgen.J.H. & Wells, P.An excellent. (1994b). Predictors out of joy within the married people. Identity and you can Individual Variations , 17 (3), 313-321.
Lire la suite